![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhAIcOD0RIZ5wOucPn5wx8FRgkg7RcX_71k3PLRUsNMe_3-OtkqUq5wC2MwmYQfmRD8O7TXRmmyEh3lltTdNzdn9vVWXjUTLm7Eqimi1v1rCMJ3Mz1CwT6vY95QdpF7gV0Ov1dqxiYwRg/s400/notRadioactive.jpg)
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhv20rB60hi6He9wtIVucUjqb8-aVnLzMUoug-sGQOW16J_k0UPPWIG6-T8oDkaQRAxzeC7-T3i5LGgzQfYBfm70s8IejqsHpx6YnMtzyXnM3dx3kuzIJguCjyHwI5lK1PVydbTvujNXw/s400/RadioactiveSnow.jpg)
Mr X took these readings on 3/26/2011. The photos may not be used without express permission.
The first photo shows an empty plate with a reading of 0.012 mR/Hr. The second photo shows a plate of radioactive snow with a reading of 0.045 mR/Hr. The radiation from the snow is 3.75 times greater than the empty plate. Of course, none of this means much from a fallout perspective without a reading from pre-Fukushima snow; but who knew snow was so hot?
No comments:
Post a Comment